Constitutional Cases

Key characteristics of constitutional cases include:

1. Involvement of Constitutional Issues: Constitutional cases center on questions related to the interpretation or application of constitutional provisions. These issues may encompass individual rights, separation of powers, federalism, due process, equal protection, and other fundamental constitutional principles.
2. Constitutional Challenges: These cases often involve challenges to the constitutionality of laws, regulations, government actions, or other official acts. Plaintiffs may argue that a particular law or action violates constitutional rights or principles.
3. Rights and Liberties: Many constitutional cases involve disputes concerning individual or group rights and freedoms protected by the constitution. Examples include cases related to freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to privacy, and equal protection under the law.
4. Significance and Precedent: Constitutional cases are typically of great significance, as their outcomes can set legal precedents that guide future interpretations of the constitution. These precedents influence the development of constitutional law over time.
5. Resolution in the Courts: Constitutional cases are often resolved through litigation in courts. Depending on the country’s legal system, these cases may be heard at various levels of the judiciary, including trial courts, appellate courts, and the highest court (e.g., the Supreme Court in the United States).
6. Impact on Government Actions: The decisions in constitutional cases can impact the actions and behavior of government entities, officials, and institutions. They may necessitate changes in laws or policies to align with constitutional requirements.
7. Public Interest: Constitutional cases often attract significant public attention and debate due to their far-reaching implications for individual rights and government powers.
8. In various countries, constitutional cases play a vital role in upholding the rule of law, protecting citizens’ rights, and ensuring the constitutional framework is respected and enforced.

In legal terms, an appeal may be lodged against any judgment, decree, or final order issued by a High Court in the context of civil, criminal, or other proceedings. This appeal is permissible if and only if the relevant High Court provides a certification, affirming that the case under consideration pertains to a substantial question of law concerning the interpretation of the constitution. Upon the issuance of such certification, any party involved in the case is entitled to bring an appeal before the Supreme Court on the basis of the assertion that any such legal question has been erroneously determined.

1. Jurisdiction of High Courts: High Courts in Pakistan have the authority to hear and decide civil, criminal, and other types of cases. These decisions can result in judgments, decrees, or final orders, which are legally binding.
2. Appeals from High Courts: If a party involved in a case decided by a High Court wishes to challenge the decision, they can file an appeal. The right to appeal is a fundamental aspect of the justice system, allowing parties to seek a review of a decision by a higher court.
3. Substantial Question of Law: However, not all cases are eligible for appeal to the Supreme Court. The appeal must involve a substantial question of law. This means that the issue in question must be significant and must pertain to the interpretation of the Pakistann Constitution. Substantial questions of law can include matters of constitutional interpretation, rights, and principles.
4. Certification by the High Court: Before a party can appeal to the Supreme Court, the concerned High Court must certify that the case indeed involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution. This certification acts as a filter to ensure that only cases with constitutional significance proceed to the Supreme Court.
5. Appeal to the Supreme Court: Once the High Court issues the certification, any party involved in the case can file an appeal before the Supreme Court. This appeal is made on the basis that the High Court has potentially erred in its interpretation or application of the constitutional law.
6. Supreme Court Review: The Supreme Court of Pakistan, being the highest court in the land, has the authority to review the decision made by the High Court. The primary focus of this review is the substantial question of law as certified by the High Court.
7. Judicial Discretion: It’s important to note that while the High Court’s certification is necessary, the Supreme Court still retains discretion to decide whether or not to admit the case for review. This discretion is exercised on a case-by-case basis.

A writ petition is a formal request made to a high court to enforce fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of Pakistan or to seek relief against an unlawful act or omission by a public authority. Writ petitions are considered extraordinary remedies, used when other legal avenues have been exhausted or are unavailable.

Types of Writ Petitions in Pakistan

There are five main types of writ petitions in Pakistan:

• Habeas corpus: This writ is used to challenge the unlawful detention of a person. If the court finds that the detention is unlawful, it will order the release of the person.
• Mandamus: This writ is used to compel a public authority to perform a legal duty that they have failed to perform. For instance, if a government department is refusing to provide a service to which the petitioner is entitled, a writ of mandamus can be filed to compel the department to provide the service.
• Prohibition: This writ is used to prevent a public authority from taking an action that is unlawful. For example, if a government agency is about to issue an order that would violate the rights of the petitioner, a writ of prohibition can be filed to prevent the agency from issuing the order.
• Certiorari: This writ is used to review the decision of a lower court or tribunal to see if it has exceeded its jurisdiction or acted without due process of law. If the court finds that the lower court or tribunal has erred, it may quash or set aside the decision.
• Quo warranto: This writ is used to challenge the right of a person to hold a public office. For instance, if a person has been appointed to a public office in violation of the law, a writ of quo warranto can be filed to have their appointment declared invalid.

Conclusion

Writ petitions serve as a crucial safeguard against the violation of fundamental rights and the abuse of power by public authorities in Pakistan. By providing a mechanism for individuals to challenge unlawful actions and seek judicial intervention, writ petitions help to uphold the rule of law and protect the rights of citizens.

Pakistan has a number of landmark constitutional cases that have significantly influenced the development of constitutional law and the protection of fundamental rights in the country. Some notable constitutional cases in Pakistan include:

1. State v. Dosso (1958): This case set a precedent for judicial review and the role of the judiciary in upholding the constitution. It addressed the legitimacy of the government of President Iskander Mirza and played a crucial role in the legal history of Pakistan.
2. Asma Jilani v. Government of the Punjab (1972): This case established the principle of the “basic structure” of the Constitution, stating that certain fundamental features of the constitution could not be amended.
3. Zaheeruddin v. WAPDA (1980): In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan defined the concept of “judicial review” and affirmed the authority of the judiciary to review the constitutionality of government actions and legislation.
4. Mehram Ali v. Federation of Pakistan (1987): This case is famous for its contribution to the jurisprudence of Islamic law in Pakistan. It examined the role of Islamic law in the legal system and determined that the Federal Shariat Court had the authority to review laws for compliance with Islamic principles.
5. Benazir Bhutto v. President of Pakistan (1988): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the President of Pakistan’s decision to dissolve the National Assembly and dismiss the Prime Minister, Benazir Bhutto, was unconstitutional.
6. Tikka Iqbal Muhammad Khan v. Chief of Army Staff (2001): This case addressed the legality of the 1999 military coup led by General Pervez Musharraf. The Supreme Court declared the coup unconstitutional.
7. Sindh High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan (2009): This case dealt with the restoration of the judiciary after the lawyers’ movement against President Pervez Musharraf’s actions. The Supreme Court ordered the reinstatement of judges and the Chief Justice of Pakistan.
8. Panama Papers Case (2017): This case revolved around allegations of corruption and money laundering against then-Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his family. The Supreme Court’s decision disqualified Nawaz Sharif from office.
9. Asia Bibi Case (2018): This case involved the appeal of Asia Bibi, a Christian woman who had been sentenced to death for blasphemy. The Supreme Court acquitted her, leading to widespread discussions about blasphemy laws in Pakistan.

These are just a few examples of landmark constitutional cases in Pakistan. The country’s judiciary has played a crucial role in interpreting and upholding the Constitution, protecting the rule of law, and safeguarding fundamental rights.

For further advice, feel free to contact Nasir & Co.